Click on this button to go to the introduction to economics homepageclick on this link to view the course syllabusclick on this link to view the course content.  This link is where all of my lecture notes are located.click on this ling to view the required assignment for each unit in introduction to economicsclick on this link to view a glossary of terms for the introduction to economics course.


 

UNIT 7

SOCIAL STRATIFICATION

 

All social groups and societies contain differences amongst their members. Some groups have more access to the resources of society than others.  This means the daily life experiences of the various groups will be different.  Since there exists an unequal distribution of resources between group members, social stratification then, looks at the structured social inequality.  This unit will look at how groups of individuals, as well as nations, can be organized around a system of inequality.

This is a picture of the Titanic sinking.Social Stratification refers to  a system in which people are divided or ranked into layers according to their relative power, property, and prestige.  This hierarchical arrangement in society allows different access to power and resources.  Every society stratifies its members.  Some societies have greater inequality than others, but stratification is universal.  Social stratification persists over generations and involves not only inequality, but an established belief system to support it.  Social stratification is an important element in our daily lives, and it can even determine if we live or die.  At the bottom of the page I have recommended the movie "Titanic".  An assessment of the survivors found that 60% of first-class passengers survived, 36% of second-class passengers, and only 24% of third-class passengers survived. There have been three main systems of stratification throughout history: slavery, caste, and class.  Each is explored in greater detail below.

Systems of Stratification

Slavery

This is a picture of a slave asking if he is not also a man and a brother.Although slavery still exists today, it does not receive overt governmental or cultural support. Yet, historically slavery as an institution existed in many of the world's dominant cultures.  Very few cultures of the world have avoided being enslaved by others.

Causes of Slavery.  Throughout history, people have been enslaved for three main reasons.  The first is the repayment of a debt.  In some cultures an individual who cannot pay a debt might be enslaved by the creditor.  Once the debt was paid the slave was to regain his freedom.  A second cause of slavery was for the violation of a law, such as murder or robbery.  A murderer or thief might be enslaved by the family of the victim as compensation for their loss.  The most common way to end up a slave occurred through war and conquest.  The losing group in a battle would often become slaves.

Conditions of Slavery.  The conditions of slaves varied by culture.  In some cases, slavery was temporary. You might be a slave for a set number of years, or you might be able to buy your way out.  Slavery was not always inherited by birth.  In some cultures, children of slaves were free.  Finally, not all slaves were powerless and poor.  Some slaves accumulated vast sums of wealth.  However, most slaves owned no property and were powerless.

1.  Excerpts from Slave Narratives

Slavery in the New World.  Slavery as an institution paralleled the development of the new world. The economies of the United States and Latin America depended on slave labor.  One new area of research on slavery in the New World takes a new look at the connection between slavery and racism.  It has long been believed that racism came first and that slavery was a byproduct of such racism.  New research seems to suggest the opposite.  Racism didn't lead to slavery, but rather slavery led to racism.  European culture developed an ideology to defend slavery that made their culture superior and other cultures, particularly African, inferior.

1.  Focus on Slavery in the New World

2.  Life Aboard a Slave Ship 

 

This is a picture of a modern slave from West Africa who escaped a coca plantation which is where chocolate comes from.Slavery Today.  Slavery still exists in some parts of the world today.  In some countries of the world such as the Sudan, slaves are an important source of labor.  In other parts of the world where agricultural production is important, slaves are used in the production and harvesting of export crops. But in much of the rest of the world, sex has become an important element in slavery.  Many women around the world are bought and sold as sex slaves.  Much of this activity is controlled by organized crime. 

 

1.  Modern Slave Trade-freetheslaves.net

2.  Child Slavery

3.  Slavery in the United States Today 

4.   Restaveks:  Haiti's Child Slaves

5.   U.S. State Department Trafficking of Persons Report

 

 

Study/Review Check:  How could I set up a test question with the information above?  I could create a multiple choice question which asks, "Which of the following is not an accurate statement concerning slavery?", or a short answer question that asks, "Briefly describe modern slavery".

 

Caste

This picture is an untouchable woman who is drinking water from her hands. She is not allowed to use a glass or cup. Why would this be so?A caste system is a society where one's status is ascribed.  A caste is determined by birth and lasts a lifetime.  Caste is enforced through endogamy (marriage within one's group) and restrictions on occupations and residence.  The caste system is a rigid hierarchy which is preserved through formal law and cultural practices.  A case system is closed, where birth alone decides one's position in life.  People are ranked in rigid categories, and there is little or no social mobility based on individual effort.  The most notable caste system is in India.  Although the Indian caste system is no longer sanctioned by the government, its effects remain.  Many people in India still cling to notions of superiority and inferiority for different groups.  Another example of the caste system was the apartheid system in South Africa prior to its removal in the early 1990's.  Here's a question to ponder.  Was the South prior to the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960's an example of a caste system?

1.  The Caste System and Hinduism

2.  Caste, and The God of Small Things

3.  Broken People:  Violence Against India's "Untouchables"

Class

A class based system is the most common form of stratification today.  The United States operates in a class based system.  A class system is a way of ranking groups according to their relative power, property, and prestige.  The main distinction between a class based system and slavery and caste, is that a class system is much more open.  In other words, the ability for one's social class to change is greater for class based systems.  This is one reason why so many people emigrate to the United States.  In a class based system, there are no laws that specify occupations or marriage arrangements based on birth.  A class system allows for social mobility, or the movement up and down the social ladder.  A more detailed account of social class can be found in a section at the end of this unit.

Theories of  Stratification

Social stratification focuses on the social inequality that exists in society at large. Therefore, the two perspectives that have something to say on this issue are conflict theory and structural- functionalist theory. 

The Structural-Functionalist Perspective.  As you recall from earlier discussions, structural-functionalists believe that a harmonious society is one characterized by cohesion, cooperation, and stability.  For a society to run smoothly, it must be carefully managed.  Positions in government, business, schools, and other social institutions need to be filled by qualified individuals if a society is to operate smoothly. Therefore, according to structural-functionalist perspective, social stratification exists to motivate qualified people into those important positions. This perspective emphasizes that stratification is inevitable for the following reasons:

1)  Society must make certain that its positions are filled.

2)  Some positions are more important than others.

3)  The more important positions must be filled by the most qualified people.

4)   To motivate the more qualified people to fill these positions, society must offer them greater rewards.

This is a picture of a heart surgeon performing open heart surgery.Positions with greater responsibility require greater accountability.  They also require a huge investment in time, energy, and money.  Think of a heart surgeon.  To become one requires paying for an expensive medical education for at least 10 years.  How do we motivate someone to put up with such demanding schedules and expensive bills?  According to structural-functionalists, we do it by offering doctors great rewards.   This function of rewarding people with talent has developed in modern societies a meritocracy, which is a stratified society based on personal merit.  In such a society equality of opportunity is promoted, while at the same time,  establishing a system of unequal rewards. 

Not everyone agrees with this viewpoint.  Some sociologists want to know, how do you measure the importance of a position?  How do we know lawyers are more important than physical therapists?  How do we know that a famous celebrity that makes $50 million dollars a year contributes more to our society than an engineer?  They would also point out that not all positions are awarded on merit.  The sons and daughters of wealthy parents tend to end up with nice jobs.  In 1996, Gilbert Amelio, CEO of Apple Computers, laid off more than 4,000 employees and saw Apple stock lose 40% of its value, but still paid himself more than $23 million.  Finally, if stratification is functional, then it should benefit everyone in society.  Clearly it does not. 

 

Study/Review Check:  How could I set up a test question with the information above?  I could create a multiple choice question which asks, "All of the following are reasons to explain the structural-functional perspective on social stratification EXCEPT?", or a short answer question that asks, "Briefly describe the structural-functionalist perspective on social stratification".

 

This is a picture of a group of sheiks who are part of the power elite in Middle Eastern countries.The Conflict Perspective.  Conflict theorists believe that society is held together by conflict and coercion, instead of function.  From a conflict perspective, society is based on groups competing for scarce resources.  Some groups have more power and resources than others. Those groups with an advantage do not want to share with those groups who are at a disadvantage.  Conflict theorists believe that society is ruled by the privileged elites.  These ruling elites, who have the most resources, tend to dominate and exploit the less privileged groups in society.  According to conflict theorists, inequality allows elites to control the distribution of resources, enforce laws, and influence value systems.  Thus, the lower classes in society experience blocked social mobility.  

Global Stratification

Just as individuals within a society can be ranked according to power, property, and prestige, so too can countries around the world.  There are rich countries and there are poor countries. The term global stratification refers to patterns of social inequality in the world as a whole. The degree of stratification that exists in a society can vary.  Click on the link below to see a comparison of stratification in the United States, Germany, and Brazil.   Below is a description of some of the characteristics of the global system of stratification.

Distribution of Income Among Five Quintiles in Three Countries

 

Modern Classifications of Global Stratification

 There are three main classifications for global stratification.  These new terms are the result of recent cultural and political changes.  The three classifications are: 

1)  Most Industrialized.  Countries with the most modern, industrialized economies.  Most of these countries have moved into the "post-industrial" phase of societal development.  Examples would be: the United States, most of Europe, and Japan.  These are the wealthiest countries of the world.  These countries have the highest standard of living.  Most people live in homes with electricity and indoor plumbing.  Most children attend public schools.  People in these societies have the longest life expectancy.  Average annual income per person ranges $10,000 a year in South Africa to $35,000 in Norway.  These countries make up 18% of the world's population but enjoy 79% of the world's total income. 

2)  Industrializing.  These are economies that are in the process of industrializing on a mass scale.  They still have a reliance on small farms and businesses.  Examples would be Russia, Eastern Europe, Mexico, and the Philippines. Average annual income per person is between $3,000 and $10,000 a year.  Some groups of people (mainly those living in cities) have prosperous lives, while many living in rural areas struggle with poverty. People in industrializing societies make up 70% of the world's population.

3)  Least Industrialized.  These are economies where there is little industrialization.  A large percentage of the work force is employed in the agricultural sector.  Much of Africa, parts of South America, and some Asian nations fall into this category. These are the poorest nations of the world. Many citizens do not have access to electricity and indoor plumbing in their homes.  They have the lowest life expectancy.  Average annual income per person is less than $3,000 a year.  People in least-industrialized countries make up 12% of the world's population. 

1.  Living in and on a Dump in Guatemala (youtube video)

 

Study/Review Check:  How could I set up a test question with the information above?  I could create a multiple choice question which asks, "Someone living on between $3,000 and $10,000 per year would belong to which of the categories for global stratification?", or a short answer question that asks, "Briefly describe the three categories of global stratification".

 

 

Global Stratification Statistics

Mean Per Capita GDP in Poor, Middle, and Rich Countries

Countries by Wealth

Number of

Countries

Per Capita GDP

Richest Countries: Over $10,000

26

$18,021

Middle Income Countries:  $1000 to $10,000

65

$3,031

Poorest Countries: Less than $1,000

65

$481

 

 

Countries by Wealth

Number

Annual Mean Growth of GDP from 1975 to 1997

Richest Countries:  Over $10,000

26

1.85%

Middle level Countries:  Between $1000 and $10,000

65

1.34%

Poorest Countries:  Less than $1,000

65

0.12%

 


 Characteristic of nations by levels of per capita GDP

Indicators of Basic Living Conditions

Richest Nations

(Per Capita GDP over $10,000)

Middle Level Nations 

(Per Capita GDP between $1000 and $10,000)

Poorest Nations

(Per Capita GDP less than $1,000)       

Health Issues

Under Five Mortality Rate per 1000 Births

 

7.0

 

30.3

 

126.6

Life Expectancy at Birth

 

77.3

70.0

56.1

Percent of Infants with Low Birth Rate

5.8%

8.8%

14.3

Percent of People with access to safe water

97%

83%

57%

Percent of Children under One Vaccinated for Measles

90%

87%

67%

Percent of People with adequate sanitation

 

77%

 

78%

 

44%

Gender Issues

Percent of Females Literate

 

 

95.6%

 

84.5%

 

52.4%

Female School Enrollment as a percent of Males Enrollment

100.4%

 

99.4%

 

87.4%

Life Expectancy for Females as a percent of males

108

107

106

Maternal Death Rate

Per 100,000 live Births

Education Information

12.1

146.5

 

786.0

Percentage Adult literate

 

96.2%

87.5%

62.3

School Enrollment Rate

Basic Demographic Data

85.6%

72.5%

49.2%

Total Fertility Rate

1.9

2.7

4.8

 

Percent of Population in Urban Area

81.5%

61.4%

34.4%

Population Growth Rate 

                                   

1.2

1.6

2.4

 

Total Population in thousands

825,157

1,325986

3,587,052

Source:  United Nations Development Programme, World Progress Report 1999.

1.  2011 Human Development Index International Comparison

 

 

Theories of How the World's Nations Became Stratified

To the student of sociology, the question of how did the world's nation's become stratified is an important one.  How did world inequality occur?  Below is a list of some of the explanations sociologists use in describing world stratification.

Modernization Theory.  Modernization theory falls under the structural-functionalist approach.  This theory states that the whole world was poor up until the first European countries began to industrialize.  Modernization theory explains global stratification in terms of technological and cultural differences between nations.  Western European cultures produced advances in technology that spurred the industrial revolution, which created an environment that allowed the development of capitalist economies. There are stages to economic development that all societies must pass through.  High income countries then can play an important role in the economic development of low-income societies.  This can be accomplished by rich countries exporting and promoting the use of birth control technology, teaching high-tech farming methods to poor nations, introducing machinery and information technology which raises productivity, and by providing foreign aid for large projects such as irrigation systems and power plants. According to modernization theory, rich countries are part of the solution to the problem of global stratification.

Culture of Poverty.  This theory also falls under the umbrella of structural-functionalism.  Culture of poverty  is the only stratification theory which attempts to place some of the blame of poverty on the poor society.  It looks at internal reasons for poverty.  This theory believes that poverty is perpetuated from one generation to the next because of cultural factors of the society.  Such cultural factors could include:  a desire to cling to traditional ways, a distrust or fear of technology, or religion.  This theory became quite popular in the United States during the 1970's and 1980's in explaining poverty in urban areas and why people were on welfare from one generation to the next.  

1. Culture of Poverty

The two theories described above have a perspective of wealthy nations being helpful or beneficial in reducing stratification and poverty. The theories outlined below see rich countries as part of the problem, making poor countries economically dependent and in debt.

 

This is a picture of English colonists in an African village.Colonialism.  This theory explores the process by which one country takes over another country.  This is usually done by force.  Under colonialism, the "mother" country will exploit the resources of the "host" country.  Raw materials are shipped back to the home country to be converted into products for sale.  Countries that have been colonized are expected to purchase their finished products from the colonizing country.  The colonizing country creates a social structure (government, laws, schools) for its benefit.  Many of today's least industrialized countries have had a period of colonialism in their past.  Colonialism allowed the economies of countries like Great Britain and France to grow, while the country that was occupied saw its economy stagnate.  Most of the world's nation's that were colonized have not seen their economies recover since.

Maps of Colonialism

 

World System Theory.  The sociologist Immanuel Wallerstein developed "world system theory" to explain global stratification.  World system theory argues that no country can be seen in isolation, and that there exists a world economic system that must be understood as a single unit.  The term globalization is often used with world system theory.  It explores how the capitalistic nations economies, in particular, have become tied together over the past few centuries.  According to this theory, the world has developed where there exists a camp of wealthy nations, and a camp of poor nations.  At the center of the world economic system are the rich powerful industrialized capitalist countries that control the system.  These are called the core countries.  Around these nations are the semiperipheral countries.  These countries occupy an intermediate position in the world-system, and include such countries as South Korea, Mexico, and Turkey.  The semiperipheral countries are at a middle level of income and are partly industrialized.  They extract profits from the peripheral countries and pass the profits on to the core countries.  At the bottom of this system are the peripheral countries.  These countries are poor, not industrialized, largely agricultural, and manipulated by the core countries which extract resources and profits from these countries.  They are mostly in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.  This world economic system has resulted in a modern world in which some countries have obtained great wealth, but other counties have remained poor.  The core countries, that is the Western European countries, and the United States and Japan, make themselves wealthy by exploiting the resources of the peripheral countries at low prices, world-system theory suggests.

1.   Summary of World System Theory

2.  Why are People Opposed to Globalization?

3. Synopsis and Analysis of World System Theory

Dependency Theory.  Dependency theory is closely related to world system theory.  This theory looks at results of European colonization and imperialism.  The persistence of poverty exists even after the colonial power has left.  The least industrialized nations have grown dependent on the most industrialized nations, both politically and economically.  This theory argues that the poverty in the world's poor nations is a result of exploitation by the wealthier nations.  An example would be the term "Banana Republic."  This term refers to countries in Central American ( Honduras, Costa Rica, and others) that have a limited numbers of resources to offer for export ( sometimes just one), such as bananas.  The economy of this country becomes linked to the economy of the country or countries which purchase the product (the United States).   For example, as long as India was dependent on Great Britain, Great Britain became wealthier and India remained poor.  Countries that produce oil, such as Saudi Arabia, would also be an example that fits dependency theory.  

1.  The Banana Republic and the United Fruit Company

 

Study/Review Check:  How could I set up a test question with the information above?  I could create a multiple choice question which asks, "All of the following are traits for world sytem theory EXCEPT?", or a short answer question that asks, "Briefly describe the term "banana republic".

 

Maintaining Global Stratification  

This is a picture of how the world bank should begin debt relief for poorer countries.Neocolonialism.   Neocolonialism also refers to the dominance of the most industrialized nations over the least industrialized nations.  This theory believes that this dominance is maintained through international organizations such as the United Nations, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund.  This means that the poorer nations will always be in debt to the wealthier nations.  Those who lend money tend to have more power than those who borrow.  This relationship can also be seen in the sale of military weapons.  Poor countries purchase millions of dollars of military hardware from the wealthier nations, and then end up with huge repayment plans, as well as outside influence in their affairs.  Under neocolonialism, there is less of a need for military control. Influence is maintained more from indirect political control and economic exploitation.  It should be mentioned that neocolonialist nations still keep large militaries for occasions when political and economic control is not enough to maintain their advantage.  The links below demonstrate the large U.S. military presence around the world.

1.  Causes of the Debt Crisis

2.  A Century of U.S. Military Interventions

3.  Neocolonialism  

4.  The U.S. Global Empire

5.  America's Empire of Bases

6.  American Unified Regional Commands

7.  International Treatment of Haiti Since the Earthquake

Multinational Corporations.  Multinational corporations play an important role in keeping poor nations poor.  The influence of multinational corporations is not limited to national boundaries.  Some multinational corporations are so large that they have larger gross domestic products than the countries they do business in.  These companies try to manufacture their products where labor costs are the lowest.  Many people believe that large multinational corporations, such as Nike, take advantage and exploit the cheap, overseas labor market.  Multinational corporations have so much power and money, that they can influence the government of the host nation.  An example of this is how AT & T influenced our government to intervene in the affairs of Chile in 1973 with the overthrow of Allende from  the position of president of Chile. 

 

What is Social Class?

This is a picture of a pyramid demonstrating social class in ancient Egypt.Imagine for a moment, that on the same day a child is born to a wealthy family, such as the Rockerfellers or the Fords, and a child is born to a family where both parents work at jobs that pay minimum wage.  Would the experiences these children have be different from one another?  Would there chances for success be different?  This unit will explore how social class influences every aspect of your life, from school experiences, to parental and gender roles, to which political party you vote for.  As the picture to the left shows, social class exists in all societies, including ancient Egypt.

 


Social Class refers to  a large group of people who rank close to one another in wealth, power, and prestige.  Generally speaking, the components of social class are educational attainment, occupation, prestige, and income. In comparison to slavery and caste, the boundaries between classes are less defined, and therefore, there is a higher degree of mobility.  Even so, class systems are marked by an unequal distribution of wealth, power, and prestige.

We should probably stop for a moment and define wealth, power and prestige.  Wealth involves adding one's property and income.  Property refers to such things as land, homes, automobiles, jewelry, stocks and so on.  Income refers to such things as salaries, rents, and interest.  In the United States there is an unequal distribution of property and income.  68% of property in the U.S. is owned by 10% of the population.  The richest 1% of families are worth more than the bottom 90% of Americans. With respect to the distribution of income,  the top 20% of the population receives almost half of all income.  The bottom 20% receives only 4.4% of the nation's income.   Statistics indicate growing inequality.  The richest 20% have grown richer, while the bottom 20% have grown  poorer.  The average CEO pay is 400 times that of the average worker.

This is a picture of a Lexus automobile.Power refers to the ability to carry out your will despite resistance.  C. Wright Mills talks about the power elite, a group of people in the top two classes who seem to steer the direction of American society.  Mills claimed that the power elite control the three major sectors of American society- the government, the military, and the business world.  Many of these powerful people change from one sector to another.  Power elite theorists would point out that many former generals in the military upon retirement, take important jobs at multinational corporations, many in the defense industry.   Prestige refers to the respect accorded to one's position.  Why do some jobs have more prestige?  Some jobs have more prestige than others because of the following four factors: 1)  They pay more,  2) They require more education, 3) They entail more abstract thought,  and 4) They offer greater freedom, or self-direction.  Historically prestige has been displayed in different ways, from dress to how one leaves a room, to how far over one bows.  Modern displays of prestige can be found in such things as where one lives, what type of car one drives, and in the wearing of designer clothing.

1.  Wealth, Income, and Power in America

2.  Inequality.org

3.  Top Generals Getting Jobs in the Defense Industry

 

Study/Review Check:  How could I set up a test question with the information above?  I could create a multiple choice question which asks, "All of the following are components of social class EXCEPT?", or a short answer question that asks, "Briefly describe the term "power elite".

 

The U.S. Social Class Ladder

Karl Marx believed there were only two classes, the capitalists and the workers.  Sociologists today have updated Marx's classifications.  Most sociologists today believe there are six class divisions in the United States.  Social class can sometimes be best understood by comparing it to a ladder, with those at the top of the ladder enjoying a higher standard of living than those at the bottom. 

This is a picture of the Kennedy family before President Kennedy's assasination in 1963.The Capitalist Class.  This class is made up of the extremely wealthy.  They comprise approximately 1% of the population.  The capitalist class is divided into two categories: "old" and "new" money.  Old money refers to families that have been wealthy for generations. Families like the Rockerfellers, Vanderbilts, and Morgans fall into this category.  New money consists of individuals who have made money in areas such as the stock market, entertainment, sports, or the internet.  Those who are in the new money category lack the influential social networks that those in old money enjoy.  Individuals in the capitalist class typically earn over $1,000,000 per year.  They have probably attended prestigious universities.  They occupy the top executive positions in America's corporations.

1 21 CEO's Get "Golden Parachute" of over $100 Million Each

2.  Research Showing Wealthy People Less Ethical (youtube video)

 

The Upper Middle Class.  For members of the upper middles class, education is extremely important.  Their wealth, power, and prestige they acquired are a result of mastering difficult skills.  People in the upper middle class usually have postgraduate degrees.  They represent the professionals and upper managers that run the various institutions in the United States.  They make up approximately 15% of the population, and earn somewhere in the area of $125,000 a year.  

The Lower Middle Class.  Roughly 34% of our nation's population falls in the lower middle class category.  Individuals in this class typically have some college training.  They constitute the lower level managers and semi-professionals in the various institutions in American society. They earn around $60,000 a year.  Most of the degree programs offered at a technical college will place people in the lower middle class.

This is a picture of factory workers.The Working Class.  Approximately 30% of the population is considered working class. Members of the working class generally have only a high school education, and therefore have fewer marketable skills.  Most factory and clerical workers are working class. They average around $35,000 a year in salary.  Many working class jobs offer little personal satisfaction, have continual supervision, and provide few benefits.  

The Working Poor.  Members of the working poor constitute roughly 16% of the population.  They may or may not have a high school education.  They earn between $18,000 - 20,000 a year.  They work at unskilled, low-paying, temporary jobs.  Many are functionally illiterate.  Many work at minimum wage jobs.  Laborers and workers in the service industry, such as a fast food restaurant or at a hotel, are the working poor.

1.  Working Class:  White Trash, the Construction of an American Scapegoat  

The Underclass.  The underclass represent the lowest tier in the social class ladder.  They constitute about 4% of the population.  Because they are often unemployed, working part-time, or on welfare, they only earn approximately $10,000 a year.  Since they typically have very little education, they consequently have few marketable skills.  Most of the underclass are concentrated in large urban areas.  They are often individuals who have had a difficult time adjusting to a highly technical society.  

1.  People Like Us: Social Class in America

2.  The Rich Are Winning the US Class War

3.  Minnesota Bill to Make it a Crime for the Poor to Have More Than $20 in Their Pockets

 

Study/Review Check:  How could I set up a test question with the information above?  I could create a multiple choice question which asks, "All of the following are features of the upper middle class EXCEPT?", or a short answer question that asks, "Briefly describe the features of the working class".

 

Consequences of Social Class

The social class one occupies affects every aspect of a person's life.  Listed below is a short description of how social class impacts various aspects of a person's life.

Social Class and Family Life.  A person's social class will affect such family issues as how to raise a child, the selection of a marital partner and the incidence of divorce.  Members of the upper classes tend to stress the importance of family history, and hence, see mate selection as something that affects more than just the individual.  Divorce rates are higher for the lower classes.  Working class parents tend to encourage children to conform to conventional norms and obey authority figures.  Upper class parents tend to encourage their children to express their individuality and use their imaginations. 

Social Class and Politics.  One's social class influences how one views the world.  Thus, political views are shaped by the family, work, and educational institutions of society.  There are always exceptions, but generally speaking, the higher you are on the social ladder the more likely you are to vote Republican.  The lower classes, which feel less secure about their livelihood, are more likely to vote Democratic.  The working classes tend to be more liberal on economic issues, but more conservative on social issues.  The upper-classes tend to be the opposite, having conservative economic views and liberal social views. 

Social Class and Health.  One's social class has a direct impact on one's health.  The lower one is on the social ladder, the more likely they are to die before the expected age.  One of the main reasons for this is that there is less access to health care for the classes at the bottom of the social ladder.  Unsafe and unhealthy work environments are other contributing factors.  The members of the lower classes also have more mental health problems due to the stress package that comes with living in poverty.  Those at the top of the social class ladder have more access to nutritious food, safe work environments, and regular medical care, factors which promote a longer life-span.  

1.  Cancer Alley

2.  Equity in Health

3.  Working Class Americans Getting Ill From Making Our  Furniture

Social Class and Technology.  With the movement to an information based society, those in the lower classes have a more difficult time adjusting to new technology, and henceforth, finding good paying jobs.  The upper classes benefit from the technology because they can move a business from one country to another and because they manage the technology.  The poor do not benefit.  Their bargaining power is decreased.  As new technology enters the workplace, it eliminates jobs.  The lower classes have even less to offer in the marketplace.  Their lack of education puts them in menial jobs.

To summarize, social class affects and influences every interest that a person has and every situation that a person encounters.  Click on the link below to see how social class influences a person's taste in music.

Social class and taste in Music

 

Study/Review Check:  How could I set up a test question with the information above?  I could create a multiple choice question which asks, "All of the following are consequences of social class EXCEPT?", or a short answer question that asks, "Briefly describe the connection between social class and a person's health".

 

Social Mobility

Sociologists have classified social mobility into three categories.  The first is intergenerational mobility.  Intergenerational mobility refers to changes in social class from one generation to another.  For example, recent immigrants may live their lives in the working class, but their sons and daughters may rise up to the upper middle class.  Structural Mobility refers to movements up or down the social class ladder due to structural changes in society, not individual efforts.  An example of upward structural mobility would be individuals who have made millions in new internet companies. An example of downward structural mobility would be those who lose good paying factory jobs and have to take lower paying service jobs.  Exchange Mobility refers to  people in one area move up, while people in another area move down.  A balance is maintained.  For example, many people with computer jobs may move up the social ladder, but an equal number of people who lost high paying factory jobs might move down the ladder.  It is important to remember that people can move up or down the social ladder.

Generally speaking, the rate of upward social mobility is higher in industrial and post-industrial countries than in pre-industrial countries.  Social mobility for men has been proven, but it has been difficult to prove for women.  Many women have remained employed in specific job clusters, and so the research is unclear.  Within a single generation, social mobility is uncommon.  The old "rags to riches" story is rare.  

1.  The "Myth" of Social Mobility?

2.  Is Social Mobility Getting Harder to Achieve?

3.  More Social Mobility is Found in More Equal Societies

4.  Downward Social Mobility for the Middle Class

 

Poverty

This is a picture of a person in a poor country.Poverty is a relative concept. It is hard to define.  Everyone is rich or poor compared to others. Nevertheless, our government tries to classify poverty.  It has established what is called the poverty line.  The poverty line is the official government measure of poverty.  A yearly dollar amount is calculated based on the number of people in a household.  Anyone making below that amount is considered living in poverty.

 

1.  Poverty Guidelines for the United States

2.  US Poverty Rate for Children in 2009

3.  2010 Child Poverty Rates for Rock County

4.  America's Poor:  Map of Poverty in America

5.  The Criminalization of Poverty: To Collect Welfare, first You Have to Pee Into a Cup

Who Are the Poor?  There are a number of factors that influence who is poor.  Geography is one factor.  A higher percentage of America's poor live in the South and in rural areas. A person's  race/ethnicity also influences poverty.  A higher percentage of minorities are in poverty in comparison to white Americans.  Education is another important factor in determining poverty.  The less education, the higher chance of poverty.  Another factor is the concept know as "The Feminization of Poverty".  This refers to the phenomenon where half of all families headed by women live in poverty.  This is due to divorce, births to unmarried mothers, and lower wages.  Finally, children are more likely to live in poverty than adults.  In 2003, 17.6% (12.9 million) of people under the age of eighteen are living below the poverty threshold.  A generation ago it would have been the elderly.  But because of government support through social security and Medicare, the percent of elderly living in poverty has declined.

1.  The Feminization of Poverty

2.  Basic Facts about Low-Income Children: Birth to Age 18

The Dynamics of the Poor.  Most Americans have a misconception about poverty.  They believe that the poor are poor for their whole lives.  This is not true. Most poverty is of short duration- lasting only a year or less.  Recent research seems to indicate that most poverty comes from a sudden life change, such as divorce, sudden unemployment or birth of a child.  In fact, only 12% of poverty lasts longer than 5 consecutive years.  

Why Are People Poor?  There are two competing thoughts for why people are poor.  Some sociologists believe that social structure, lack of education, necessary job skills, and discrimination, are responsible for poverty.  In other words, society is primarily responsible for poverty.  Other sociologists focus on individual characteristics.  Such things as making the choice to have children at an early age, or the lack of the skill of deferred gratification, which is the giving up of something now for something later, as reasons for people living in poverty. 

1.  Why are People Poor? 

 

Study/Review Check:  How could I set up a test question with the information above?  I could create a multiple choice question which asks, "All of the following are traits that increase a person's chance of living in poverty EXCEPT?", or a short answer question that asks, "Briefly describe the features that increase a person's chance of living in poverty".

 

Poverty Around the World

Just as poverty in the United States is relative, so is poverty around the world.  There are many definitions and debates about the number of poor in the world. One of the leading sources for information on poverty around the world is the World Bank.  The World Bank distinguishes between two types of poverty.

Extreme Poverty.  This category refers to people who live on an income of $1.25 per day.  The World Bank estimates that in the year 2008, roughly 1.4 billion people were living in extreme poverty. People in this category cannot meet basic needs for survival.  There is little or no access to education, health care, safe drinking water or sanitation.  Most people in this category live in a rudimentary shelter with few possessions and are chronically hungry. A country as a whole is deemed to suffer from extreme poverty if the proportion of the population in extreme is at least 25 percent of the total population.

Relative Poverty.  This category is defined as a household income level below a given proportion of average national income. Most of the poor in developed countries like the United States, fall into this category.  These people are poor relative to the high income earners in their society.  They have enough income to meet their daily needs, and perhaps a little extra for a few goods or services.  But they still do not have access to quality health care, education, and other cultural goods that would allow them upward social mobility.

Graphs on Poverty Rates

UC Atlas of Global Inequality

 

Study/Review Check:  How could I set up a test question with the information above?  I could create a multiple choice question which asks, "All of the following are accurate statements concerning poverty around the world EXCEPT?", or a short answer question that asks, "Briefly describe extreme poverty".

 

   Sociology in Film

Below are a list of movies that exhibit sociological concepts learned in this unit.

Titanic.  This movie explores issues related to both social stratification and social class.

Amistad.  This movie explores the issues related to slavery. 

Pixote  The life of a small Brazilian boy in a major Brazilian city. The film highlights the social stratification of the developing world, where the wealthy participate in a western dominated world culture, while the poor do not have access to the social services of a western welfare state. 

Gandhi.  This movie has a lot pertaining to sociology, but for this unit, look for issues of caste and colonialism. 

Pretty Woman.   How does a prostitute from the underclass cope in the world of the upper class?

The Joy Luck Club.  There is a lot in this film regarding sociology.  But in this unit, the concept of intergenerational mobility plays an important role. 

Recycled Life.  The dramatic and touching story of thousands of adults, children, and generations of families who live in a Guatemala City garbage dump.

 

  Sociology in Books

Below are a list of books that exhibit sociological concepts learned in this unit.

1 Shadow Cities: A Billion Squatters, a New Urban World  By Robert Neuwirth

2.  Bobos in Paradise:  The New Upper Class and How They Got There  by David Brooks

3.  Sex Trafficking: The Global Market in Women and Children  by Kathryn Farr

4.  Slavery:  A World History  by Milton Meltzer

5.  The Working Poor:  Invisible in America  by David K. Shipler

6.  Nickel and Dimed:  On Not Getting By in America  by Barbara Ehrenreich

7.  The End of Poverty:  Economic Possibilities For Our Time  by Jeffrey Sachs

 

Bibliography

 

Brym, Robert J.
     2003  Sociology: Your Compass For A New World  Canada:   Wadsworth Thomson Learning

Ferrante, Joan

     2000  Sociology:  The United States in a Global Community  United States:  Wadsworth Thomson Learning

Henslin, James M.
     2000   Essentials of Sociology: A Down-to-Earth Approach  (3rd Edition)   Boston:   Allyn and Bacon

Henslin, James M.
     2010   Essentials of Sociology: A Down-to-Earth Approach  (8th Edition)   Boston:   Allyn and Bacon
Macionis, John J.

      1999 Sociology.  Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall

Macionis, John J.

      2006  Society:  The Basics (8th Edition)  Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:  Prentice Hall

 

 

Copyright 2002 Glenn Hoffarth All Rights Reserved